What is Synthetic Research?
Synthetic research refers to the use of artificially generated data, personas, or environments to simulate real-world conditions, behaviors, and insights. Unlike traditional research that relies on direct observation or interaction with human participants, synthetic research leverages technologies such as machine learning, large language models, agent-based simulations, and computational design to produce structured representations of individuals or systems. These synthetic constructs are used to explore hypotheses, test product-market fit, prototype user experiences, or model complex social phenomena—often with greater speed, scalability, and experimental flexibility than conventional approaches.
This methodology is gaining traction across disciplines—from marketing and UX design to social science and organizational strategy—because of its potential to generate insights where traditional data collection may be constrained by cost, time, ethics, or access. However, the value of synthetic research depends on its methodological rigor, representational fidelity, and critical engagement with its limitations. The Synthetic Research Academy exists to help practitioners and scholars navigate these complexities, establish best practices, and ensure synthetic research fulfills its promise as a transformative research paradigm.
Read more in our resources section
Potential Applications of Synthetic Research
Synthetic research—where simulated data, synthetic personas, and algorithm-driven experiments stand in for (or augment) real-world observation—opens a surprisingly broad toolkit for organizations and scholars alike. In consumer-insight work, for instance, teams can spin up virtual panels of demographically balanced synthetic “participants” to test messaging or pricing hypotheses in hours rather than weeks. Because every variable is controllable, researchers can isolate causal relationships that would be confounded in live markets, then validate only the most promising ideas with human participants. The same principle applies to product-design sprints: synthetic users can run through wireframes at scale, flagging usability breakpoints long before a single line of production code is written.
Beyond insight-gathering, synthetic research serves as a low-risk proving ground for ethically sensitive or safety-critical scenarios. Public-health agencies now model the spread—and social response—of hypothetical pathogens in fully synthetic communities, stress-testing intervention strategies without exposing anyone to harm. Financial regulators run “synthetic markets” populated by configurable agent behaviors to see how new rules ripple through liquidity, volatility, and systemic risk. Even autonomous-vehicle engineers lean on photorealistic synthetic streets to expose driving models to rare edge cases—black ice at dawn, a stray child chasing a ball—far faster than they could amass those moments on real roads.
Education and workforce development are also fertile ground. Synthetic case studies let students experiment with complex negotiations or crisis-communications drills where no client reputation is actually on the line. In corporate L&D, generative role-play bots can emulate difficult customers or nuanced cultural contexts so employees practice empathy, de-escalation, and cross-cultural fluency safely. Meanwhile, data-science teams use synthetic tabular datasets both to augment scarce first-party data and to share benchmarks externally without leaking proprietary or personally identifiable information—accelerating open innovation while respecting privacy laws.
Finally, synthetic research changes the economics of longitudinal and comparative studies. Because synthetic cohorts never “age out” or attrit, phenomena such as brand loyalty or chronic-disease progression can be observed over simulated decades in a single weekend of compute time. Researchers can then rerun the entire timeline under altered policy levers—tax incentives, media blackouts, algorithm tweaks—to see precisely when and why outcomes diverge. The result is a more exploratory, bolder research mindset: one in which asking “what if?” costs pennies and uncovering robust insights no longer waits for reality to cooperate.